In an article published by The New York Times last weekend, former Solicitor General Kenneth W. Starr argues for allowing cameras in the courtroom, especially for higher profile cases. Â Starr points out that important verdicts are issued each year that affect people across the nation. Yet because most United States citizens are unable or unwilling to attend in person (or simply unaware of) some of these crucial cases, and because only a small number of spectators are typically allowed into courtrooms, following the proceedings is difficult for most people.
Starr characterizes camera opponents as part of an “old guard” who think “that cameras would transform the court into ‘Judge Judy.’” Â Instead, according to Starr, giving citizens realtime access to what happens in courtrooms is consistent with one of this country’s founding principles, which is that the people have the “right to know how their government works.”
Kenneth Starr’s opinion piece adds to the growing pressure on a reluctant judiciary to provide the kind of public access that has become commonplace for the other branches of government. Â Courtroom View Network continues to webcast trials from all U.S. jurisdictions that allow courtroom cameras. Â To read Starr’s full article, click here.